Table 1: Commonly Used Qualitative Methodological Approaches Case Study Quantitative research is based upon objectivism or positivism, the belief in the existence of an absolute truth that, through effective research, can be discovered or described. The most profound difference is the epistemology-or view on reality-that each technique is founded upon. doi 10.31235/osf.Qualitative research differs from quantitative research in many important ways. “Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.” SocArXiv. VandeVusse, Alicia, Jennifer Mueller, and Sebastian Karcher. “Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent.” Qualitative Health Research. Qualitative data project supplementary data project Transparency (LC Subject Headings (LCSH)) Informed consent (ICPSR Subject Thesaurus) Ĭisgender people (LC Subject Headings (LCSH)) Qualitative research (LC Subject Headings (LCSH)) Use the Contact button at the top right to email this Data Project's contact. doi: 10.1177/10497323211054058.ĭata for: Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Social SciencesĪbortion, Qualitative research, informed consent, data, Cisgender people, Transparency, data sharing
![sample codebook for qualitative research sample codebook for qualitative research](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/254091978_Developing_and_Using_a_Codebook_for_the_Analysis_of_Interview_Data_An_Example_from_a_Professional_Development_Research_Project/links/02e7e5368311655026000000/largepreview.png)
However, a substantial number of participants demonstrated limited understanding of “data sharing.” Data available here include the following materials: overview of methods, cognitive interview consent form (with language for data sharing consent), and data sharing analysis coding scheme. Most respondents consented to data sharing, citing helping others as a primary motivation for agreeing to share their data. The data included here are coded excerpts of their answers. At the end of interviews, participants were asked to reflect on their motivations for agreeing or declining to share their data. Respondents were screened for abortion history as well to ensure that at least half the sample reported a prior abortion. Eligibility criteria included: assigned female at birth, currently identified as a woman between the ages of 18-49, English-speaking, and reported ever having penile-vaginal sex. The data consist of excerpts from cognitive interviews with 64 cisgender women in two states in January and February of 2020 in which researchers asked for respondents for consent to share de-identified data. We assessed research participants’ willingness to, understanding of, and motivations for data sharing.
![sample codebook for qualitative research sample codebook for qualitative research](https://i1.rgstatic.net/publication/215666089_Codebook_Development_for_Team-Based_Qualitative_Analysis/links/55816b4d08aea3d7096fc99f/largepreview.png)
![sample codebook for qualitative research sample codebook for qualitative research](http://cjni.net/journal/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/SeidlitzTable3.png)
As expectations to share the data that underlie research increase, understanding how participants, particularly those taking part in qualitative research, respond to requests for data sharing is necessary. As part of a qualitative study of abortion reporting in the United States, the research team conducted cognitive interviews to iteratively assess new question wording and introductions designed to improve the accuracy of abortion reporting in surveys (to be shared on the Qualitative Data Repository in a separate submission).